[Right Wing Professor]

precisely the type of sneering halfway informed pompous crap I have heard a thousand times

And that was the high point of the post.

The rest is a large lump of content-free ordure; one is surprised only at the honesty of his FReepername.

Loser

[chronic_loser]

I am glad you liked the moniker. I considered "flame_bait_for the_neurally_impaired"..., as sometimes that is more appropriate. I settled on the self deprecatory title, as that draws the cranially vacant who don't like what is said but can't for the life of them figure out how to interact. Works every time, it seems.

If you slip up and think of something that actually interacts, instead of just calls names, I am just a keystroke away. Specifically, how an empiricist avoids total skepticism re: all knowledge was the issue. Cheers.