To: AntiGuv
intelligence is intelligence I'm sure your classmates were impressed. Intelligence is one of those wonderful things that's hard to define without going circular.
Q: What is intelligence?
Psychologist: It's what my test measures.
Q: So what does your test measure?
Psychologist: Intelligence.
102 posted on
04/06/2005 6:54:37 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: VadeRetro
Actually, they were. LOL It jolted the discussion quite effectively away from the subjective, semantic nonsense to an objective consideration of intelligence. I was quite pleased, in particular, that the remainder of the class hour shifted from discussing how these other traits were a dimension of intelligence to debating (a) what in fact are the qualities of intelligence, per se; and (b) why is there a need to characterize other traits as "intelligence"..
104 posted on
04/06/2005 7:04:29 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: VadeRetro
PS. And rest assured we had numerous other theories of intelligence to ponder and consider since intelligence was a major sub-section of the course. We were hardly restricted to the false dilemma of either (a) Gardner's "multiple intelligences" theory; or (b) circular reasoning.
106 posted on
04/06/2005 7:08:02 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: VadeRetro
One more thing, I would not have any problem with an inquiry regarding how other personality traits mediate the expression of intelligence. I have a problem with the concept that other personality traits are intelligence in and of themselves. It is nothing but a semantics game in my view that (a) obfuscates the components of intelligence of its own accord; and (b) implicitly devalues these other talents apart from intelligence.
111 posted on
04/06/2005 7:17:56 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson