Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finalapproach29er; oceanview; hellbilly; ErnBatavia

I think your labeling of 'creeping authoritarianism' could be accepted as an apt description. On the other hand I think the proposed provisions could in fact be the ones that prevent a terrorist from setting off a nuke in downtown Chicago. This issue obviously needs to be examined very carefully by Congress and this is a situation where they should nit-pick at each proposal.

Director Mueller stated, "For many years, the FBI has had administrative subpoena authority for investigations of crimes ranging from drug trafficking to health care fraud to child exploitation," he stated. "Yet, when it comes to terrorism investigations, the FBI has no such authority." IF this is the case, and I'm not privy to the existing laws, then I think he makes a good case to expand those powers to include terrorism.


51 posted on 04/05/2005 8:27:31 PM PDT by fiftymegaton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: fiftymegaton

and what is the definition of terrorism?

have you heard of these agency chiefs speak of "domestic terrorism"? you would be really surprised at who that includes - it aint just muslim extremists. it's whoever thy want it to be.


52 posted on 04/05/2005 9:03:53 PM PDT by sdpatriot (remember waco and ruby ridge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson