Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Acknowledges Space Shuttle Risks
AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/5/05 | Marcia Dunn - AP

Posted on 04/05/2005 6:16:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: JOE6PAK

One of my toys when I was a little kid was an old 20 guage shotgun that the firing mechanism removed. When I say little I mean 6 years old or so.


21 posted on 04/05/2005 6:47:53 PM PDT by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
(1) This is hardly spaceflight. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo -- those were space flights. This is non-science, low-earth-orbit unusefulness, deadly and absolutely wasteful.

(2) The risk involves every civilian, mother and child, man and boy under the flight path. We were incredibly fortunate that the last Shuttle crash did not end a single innocent live on the ground -- parts fell in inhabited areas!

(3) This is a jobs program that quells more space-related endeavor than it enables. Better to put that sinecured ossified bureaucracy to work scanning luggage. Combine the Shuttle program with the baggage shuttles.

22 posted on 04/05/2005 6:55:37 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChefKeith
What NASA needs to do is send some of these "engineers" up on a flight. Then they will get off their collective a$$es and fix the problems on the Shuttle and tanks when THEY are in True Danger

My experience has been, the engineers want to fix everything, but the managers think it costs too much.

23 posted on 04/05/2005 6:58:47 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
There will never be spaceflight if we can't accept the risks.

"we" were accepting the risks previously (AND using a different, more durable, kind of foam - environmentally-unfriendly though it was) and there were HOW many successful landings?

Since the wings don't matter on launch (with the rockets essentially 'shoving' it into orbit) how about some kind of sheathing to, if not totally protect the surfaces) at least mitigate gouging? Lose the sheathing in-orbit or let it burn-off on reentry.

24 posted on 04/05/2005 7:01:37 PM PDT by solitas (So what if I support a platform that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.3.7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Then we just add them to the crew, maybe strapped to the outside for aero testing purposes.
25 posted on 04/05/2005 7:12:22 PM PDT by ChefKeith (Apply here to be added to the NASCAR Ping List, Daytona is done but we got 31 more races to go...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Ping.


26 posted on 04/05/2005 7:19:28 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I guess I'm at a loss to understand their reasoning.

On one hand, I can safely work as a government engineer for life, and retire to obscurity,

or,

tell me up front there is a 90% chance of being a well known, celebrated, roman candle, and for having big brass ones.

Hmmmm,

10% chance for success, or 100% chance of bordom.

easy...

Kick the tires and light the fire!

27 posted on 04/05/2005 7:51:07 PM PDT by FreedomFarmer (Socialism is not an ideology, it is a disease. Eliminate the vectors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
Life is risky no matter what.


28 posted on 04/05/2005 7:53:38 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It would take years and a total redesign of the fuel tank to completely eliminate foam loss and to ensure the 2003 Columbia tragedy would never be repeated, Muratore and other officials said.

That's the price that must be paid in order to remain enviromentally correct. NASA went green and the space shuttle went down.

29 posted on 04/05/2005 7:55:06 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson