Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Acknowledges Space Shuttle Risks
AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/5/05 | Marcia Dunn - AP

Posted on 04/05/2005 6:16:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SPACE CENTER, Houston - After a two-year struggle to keep big chunks of foam from coming off the shuttle fuel tank during launch, NASA acknowledged Tuesday even marshmallow-size pieces could doom the spacecraft under the worst circumstances.

Shuttle systems engineering manager John Muratore said it is a risk NASA and the nation must accept for flights to resume anytime soon.

It would take years and a total redesign of the fuel tank to completely eliminate foam loss and to ensure the 2003 Columbia tragedy would never be repeated, Muratore and other officials said.

NASA expects pieces of insulating foam no bigger than one or two marshmallows to break off the fuel tank when Discovery blasts off next month. Depending on where and when the pieces hit, they could cause catastrophic damage during re-entry, Muratore said.

By contrast, the size of the foam that shattered Columbia's left wing was the size of a carryon suitcase.

Muratore told reporters he was "trying to be scrupulously honest with you about what the potential is — but that doesn't say that's what we expect to happen." He likened the situation to trying to predict the chances of being in a fatal car accident while driving to the airport.

"If we have that worst day, and the tire is worn and you have a flat tire in the wrong place in traffic, next to a truck going 90 mph, could you get killed? Yes, you could. Is that a reasonable set of assumptions to plan your trip on? Probably not."

Muratore said assessing the danger from foam and other launch debris is an extremely complicated engineering problem made even more uncertain by the fact that computer models show little pieces of foam could cause catastrophic damage. NASA's flight experience over the decades has proven otherwise.

What NASA has to do to get smarter, Muratore said, is to stop relying on computer models and start flying the space shuttle again.

Discovery is scheduled to blast off in mid-May on the first shuttle flight since the Columbia disaster on Feb. 1, 2003. NASA plans to move the spacecraft to the launch pad Wednesday.

NASA will fly five types of repair kits aboard Discovery for the astronauts to test in space, but the rudimentary patches will accommodate holes no bigger than 4 inches. The gash that brought down Columbia was an estimated 6 inches to 10 inches in size.

Steve Poulos Jr., a shuttle project manager, said a repair kit to fix that big of a hole should be available in two years.

___

On the Net:

NASA: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: acknowledges; challenger; columbia; nasa; risks; shuttle; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: JOE6PAK

One of my toys when I was a little kid was an old 20 guage shotgun that the firing mechanism removed. When I say little I mean 6 years old or so.


21 posted on 04/05/2005 6:47:53 PM PDT by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
(1) This is hardly spaceflight. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo -- those were space flights. This is non-science, low-earth-orbit unusefulness, deadly and absolutely wasteful.

(2) The risk involves every civilian, mother and child, man and boy under the flight path. We were incredibly fortunate that the last Shuttle crash did not end a single innocent live on the ground -- parts fell in inhabited areas!

(3) This is a jobs program that quells more space-related endeavor than it enables. Better to put that sinecured ossified bureaucracy to work scanning luggage. Combine the Shuttle program with the baggage shuttles.

22 posted on 04/05/2005 6:55:37 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChefKeith
What NASA needs to do is send some of these "engineers" up on a flight. Then they will get off their collective a$$es and fix the problems on the Shuttle and tanks when THEY are in True Danger

My experience has been, the engineers want to fix everything, but the managers think it costs too much.

23 posted on 04/05/2005 6:58:47 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
There will never be spaceflight if we can't accept the risks.

"we" were accepting the risks previously (AND using a different, more durable, kind of foam - environmentally-unfriendly though it was) and there were HOW many successful landings?

Since the wings don't matter on launch (with the rockets essentially 'shoving' it into orbit) how about some kind of sheathing to, if not totally protect the surfaces) at least mitigate gouging? Lose the sheathing in-orbit or let it burn-off on reentry.

24 posted on 04/05/2005 7:01:37 PM PDT by solitas (So what if I support a platform that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.3.7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Then we just add them to the crew, maybe strapped to the outside for aero testing purposes.
25 posted on 04/05/2005 7:12:22 PM PDT by ChefKeith (Apply here to be added to the NASCAR Ping List, Daytona is done but we got 31 more races to go...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Ping.


26 posted on 04/05/2005 7:19:28 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I guess I'm at a loss to understand their reasoning.

On one hand, I can safely work as a government engineer for life, and retire to obscurity,

or,

tell me up front there is a 90% chance of being a well known, celebrated, roman candle, and for having big brass ones.

Hmmmm,

10% chance for success, or 100% chance of bordom.

easy...

Kick the tires and light the fire!

27 posted on 04/05/2005 7:51:07 PM PDT by FreedomFarmer (Socialism is not an ideology, it is a disease. Eliminate the vectors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
Life is risky no matter what.


28 posted on 04/05/2005 7:53:38 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It would take years and a total redesign of the fuel tank to completely eliminate foam loss and to ensure the 2003 Columbia tragedy would never be repeated, Muratore and other officials said.

That's the price that must be paid in order to remain enviromentally correct. NASA went green and the space shuttle went down.

29 posted on 04/05/2005 7:55:06 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson