Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
If it is what she wanted, "erring on the side of life" is terribly unfair and cruel to both her and her family.

You can't argue that she was PVS, a brain-dead vegatable, and then claim that it was cruel to keep her in a bed. Don't you see how absurd that arument is? The parents said they would take over ALL, repeat, ALL care and cost. So that argument gets destroyed.

277 posted on 04/05/2005 4:25:29 PM PDT by MrDem (Monthly Special: Will write OPUS's for Whiners and Crybabies for no charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: MrDem
Hmmm... So cruelty only takes the form of physical pain?

If someone wishes NOT to be kept alive, and for their family not to endure 15 years of life-sustaining care, it is cruel to them to keep them alive, whether they know it is happening or not.

Sophistry will get you nowhere.

280 posted on 04/05/2005 4:28:55 PM PDT by lugsoul (Wild Turkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson