Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crackingham
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I didn't take what Tom DeLay said in the way everyone else seems to be.

My reaction was that he was talking about what the judge(s) will have to answer for to God.

8 posted on 04/05/2005 2:12:10 PM PDT by carolinablonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: carolinablonde
Actually that was my reaction also, then went to the second level as outlined in the Constitution.
14 posted on 04/05/2005 2:14:05 PM PDT by dts32041 (We have instituted our own set of Nuremberg laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: carolinablonde
"Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I didn't take what Tom DeLay said in the way everyone else seems to be.

Think you may have read the posts wrong. Frist is the one everyone is talking about, Delay did say what you saw, I.E. "We will look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at the Congress and president when given jurisdiction to hear this case anew.".

20 posted on 04/05/2005 2:17:46 PM PDT by JustAnAmerican (Being Independent means never having to say you're Partisan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: carolinablonde

Of course that is what he meant. Since the MSM doesn't understand religion, it doesn't see how anybody could be held responsible in the afterlife, so of course he must have meant in this life.


I am NOT endorsing DeLay's view of what will happen with these judges in the afterlife, just agreeing that he meant they had to be judged by God, not us.


30 posted on 04/05/2005 2:26:31 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT (http://spaces.msn.com/members/criticallythinking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson