To: Crackingham
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I didn't take what Tom DeLay said in the way everyone else seems to be.
My reaction was that he was talking about what the judge(s) will have to answer for to God.
To: carolinablonde
Actually that was my reaction also, then went to the second level as outlined in the Constitution.
14 posted on
04/05/2005 2:14:05 PM PDT by
dts32041
(We have instituted our own set of Nuremberg laws.)
To: carolinablonde
"Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I didn't take what Tom DeLay said in the way everyone else seems to be.Think you may have read the posts wrong. Frist is the one everyone is talking about, Delay did say what you saw, I.E. "We will look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at the Congress and president when given jurisdiction to hear this case anew.".
20 posted on
04/05/2005 2:17:46 PM PDT by
JustAnAmerican
(Being Independent means never having to say you're Partisan)
To: carolinablonde
Of course that is what he meant. Since the MSM doesn't understand religion, it doesn't see how anybody could be held responsible in the afterlife, so of course he must have meant in this life.
I am NOT endorsing DeLay's view of what will happen with these judges in the afterlife, just agreeing that he meant they had to be judged by God, not us.
30 posted on
04/05/2005 2:26:31 PM PDT by
CharlesWayneCT
(http://spaces.msn.com/members/criticallythinking)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson