Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Young Werther; RightWhale; Robert357; snopercod
From another thread...can't remember which one....it is NOT good to a have a variable power generation as a significant portion of your base power....and wind energy is a variable power source....leads to power outages....

Rightwhale did you point that out?
36 posted on 04/05/2005 11:37:26 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
As I said, "I'm optimistic that the technical issues regarding implementing this plan can be addresssed. When Edison electrified the world he believed that DC was the way to go. Tesla, who developed the AC motor/generator came up with the answer to production and long distance transmission of electrical power using AC with its ability to be "steped up" for high voltage low amperage during the transmission phase and then "stepped down" at the end users location. "Ohm's law rules and as long as you begin with that the rest is just inventiveness"

In athe 60s when fusion was predicted to be the energy source of the future it was believed that when power demands were minimal during the night that the excess capacity would be used to hydrolize water and the Hydrogen Age would be born. Fusion never happened but hydrolizing water might be one way to "store" excess wind energy. A power plant in Michigan, (I think), uses a similar technique to store energy. Its battery is a lake on top of a mountain. At night water is pumped up the hill. During the day the water flows down the hill. The motor generators that pumped the water, (mechanical energy creating potential energy) become the generators when the water flows down the hill pass them. Yes there are system losses but the vast majority of energy is harvested.

Since variable energy sources might be a problem then overbuild the system so that expected base load production is always available. In 1991 the Scientific American measured the wind resources of the US and stated that North and South Dakota could produce 17% of US's electricity. In 1996 this estimate in Scientific American was increased to 78%. Why the increase. The room temperature superconducting technology had matured to the point where motor generators hwere much more efficient. That's the same technology which has improved memory storage devices. In 1990 if your hard drive stored 50Mb you were with it. Now a 100 Gig hard drive is passe! Go figure.

37 posted on 04/06/2005 7:25:22 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson