[Dr. Zzyzx]

Saying that Darwin was wrong was an "attack on their readers"? Is suppose for some readers who take their theories just a little too personally...

Nope, you probably misunderstood their title as I did--which is what they wanted to happen. The cover says "Was Darwin Wrong?" Then you open to the article and it says "NO" and then proceeds for many pages in a fairly condescending and mocking tone to shred anyone who might just happen to believe that something besides random chance was involved in our creation. I think you can go to their site and read it for yourself and form your own opinion.

[inquest]

Oh, sorry. It probably should have occurred to me that National Geographic wouldn't be going against Darwin. At least somebody in the back of my brain thought it was a bit odd, but I guess the message never got to the front.