I believe in science and expect scientists to adhere to their own ruleset. When they do not and base a theory partially on bad science, I refuse to accept in in whole.
For clarification, there is a difference between macro and micro-evolution. Micro is observable and repeatable, macro is not no matter what hoax fossil is used as some "missing link".
I do not believe inter-species evolution is possible but am willing to look at the facts/evidence if it is there. I also do not believe that if it were true, it would preclude God. My problem, again, is that it claims to be a scientific theory yet is based on flawed science.
The rub with this statement is you cannot prove there even is a God. You have faith there is one, but there is no scientific evidence.