To: RobRoy
ID could be science. How do you know it is not verifiable unless you scientifically analyze it?Tell me how you would design a test or prediction for ID. I can for evolution. Evolution falls within the realm of science, ID does not.
To: RadioAstronomer
You can design a test to prove macro-evolution? Now THAT is big claim. Can you give us a hint?
This proof must be unique because no one else has it or this debate wouldn't continue. I for one will take proof if you have it.
Ignoring the fact that neither you nor I are research biologists, how would you prove macro-evolution?
94 posted on
04/05/2005 10:20:49 AM PDT by
DesertSapper
(God, Family, Country)
To: RadioAstronomer
Evolution falls within the realm of science, ID does not. Well, certainly not yet. But it is still a good argument against much of the "higher" claims of evolution theory.
Saying a thing is not "scientific" does not make it dissapear in a puff of logic.
95 posted on
04/05/2005 10:22:12 AM PDT by
RobRoy
(Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
To: RadioAstronomer
>>Evolution falls within the realm of science, ID does not.<<
Neither does consciousness, but I have experienced it personally. 8^>
96 posted on
04/05/2005 10:23:53 AM PDT by
RobRoy
(Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson