Half right----evolution can't be expressed in "relatively simple mathematical formulas" (but neither can most of the OTHER interactions of biology)---however, evolution CAN (and has) successfully predicted a number of things--like the development of insectide resistance among insect populations, and the development of antibiotic resistance by bacteria.
Totally irrelevant non-sequitur. That's like arguing that if a huge meteor strikes and leaves a huge geologic hole, it verifies the theory and role of erosion.
I see neither a necessity nor a possibility of a nexus between insecticides and evolution.
>>evolution CAN (and has) successfully predicted a number of things--like the development of insectide resistance among insect populations, and the development of antibiotic resistance by bacteria.<<
A broken watch is correct twice a day -- so?
Being correct on one thing does not a proven theory make.
This in no way shows anything at all that would indicate one species is becoming another.
And I predict Sammy Sosa will hit a home run tonight ... sometimes propability takes over and it just happens ...
thanks for info - see my post 32
:)
"evolution CAN (and has) successfully predicted a number of things--like the development of insectide resistance among insect populations, and the development of antibiotic resistance by bacteria."
Not to mention, DNA analysis, bone and muscle morphologies, and the huge fossil record which is getting bigger every day.