Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005

I was an atheist in my youth and later gravitated to the God started it and billions of years later, voila.

However, as a born-again Christian, I began to realize that the foundations of most Christian doctrines (sin, death, disease, sacrifice, and so on) are based upon the first eleven chapters of Genesis.

For Christians who believe that Adam sinned and brought sin and corruption into the world, the time before Adam could not have been filled with death, destruction, disease, and violence. If Adam was the result of millions of years of death, disease, and evolution, the whole concept of the FALL makes no sense at all. Our faith would be based upon an illogical, nonsensical framework. Whence cometh sin?

Just something for Christians to consider.


171 posted on 04/05/2005 2:37:28 PM PDT by IpaqMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: IpaqMan
For Christians who believe that Adam sinned and brought sin and corruption into the world, the time before Adam could not have been filled with death, destruction, disease, and violence. If Adam was the result of millions of years of death, disease, and evolution, the whole concept of the FALL makes no sense at all. Our faith would be based upon an illogical, nonsensical framework. Whence cometh sin? Just something for Christians to consider.

And that's a problem for whom?

173 posted on 04/05/2005 2:40:51 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: IpaqMan
If Adam was the result of millions of years of death, disease, and evolution, the whole concept of the FALL makes no sense at all.

My interpretation of the fall of Adam is that it is representative of the human decision to rebel against God, from whenceforth people became conscious of the human condition. (Animals are not conscious of the condition of their mortality.) The message is what is important here.
This may not satisfy you, but the truth is, like it or not, a word for word literal interpretation of Gen. 1-2 simply does not mesh with observational fact (despite the claims of many dishonest books & websites). The Law may be meant literally, but many biblical expressions are certainly allegorical. (Do you really believe the citizens of Israel in David's time were literally more numerous than the sands of the seashore?)
177 posted on 04/05/2005 3:20:00 PM PDT by Quark2005 (Where's the science?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson