Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The sole purpose of the coastal commission is to undermine private property. Naive voters never knew when the coastal commission was created that they were voting for a soviet style council government which is unconstitutional. The coastal commissioners do not protect individual rights as all elected officials should do but promote collective rights(i.e. statist control and ownership of the land). They add an additional layer of bureaucracy which undermines the concept of self-government, they add significantly to the cost of living in CA by requiring additional studies, fees and compliance to meet their statist goals.


14 posted on 04/05/2005 7:08:18 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: hedgetrimmer; All
"The coastal commissioners do not protect individual rights as all elected officials should do but promote collective rights(i.e. statist control and ownership of the land)."

To all you FReepers and Lurkers who are not upset by these land CONservancies, no matter how they are created... Then this powerfully cogent statement by hedgetrimmer, including the sentence that follows it, are the core of the reasons to oppose both the Coastal Commission and the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy, along with all the other state run conservancies!!!

15 posted on 04/05/2005 8:20:43 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson