Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123
In fact they might have been marching/panzering west.

Could be. But Reagan was willing to take that chance. You OB "specialists" out there are forgetting one thing:
=======
NATO asked the United States to deploy intermediate range missiles to Europe in 1978 to counter the deployment of Soviet intermediate range, mobile SS 20 nuclear missiles, and the first Pershing II missiles arrived in the Brigade area in November 1983. By 1985 all three battalions of the 56th Brigade had achieved operational status.
=======
Ever wonder why the commies in West Germany were always going nutso over the Pershing?

So the Warsaw Pact had a huge numerical advantage over NATO. So why didn't they ever attack? Guesses?

33 posted on 04/04/2005 7:05:43 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: VeniVidiVici

" So the Warsaw Pact had a huge numerical advantage over NATO. So why didn't they ever attack? Guesses?"

The actual issue posed was regarding the US ATTACKING the warsaw pact to intervene in an 'internal' matter of soviet invasion of poland. Therefore the question is regarding getting through the DDR and Soviet forces in east germany to even put troops on the ground in poland. My point was that if the US started world war III it was very possible W Germany itself would be invaded. Did we have the hardware on the ground in germany to invade and pass through East Germany?


40 posted on 04/04/2005 7:20:16 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson