Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pokey78
"Progressive" is a phrase to hide a meaning. To be "progressive" really means to move as far away from the rules of God as possible. They want a world that follows the darkest side of man's desires. They would love to see a Pope elected that shares their vision. They want a pope that isn't afraid to get a little mud on himself. Maybe, to help "progressives" realize their wettest dream, we can find an atheist Pope.
9 posted on 04/04/2005 2:25:15 PM PDT by whereasandsoforth (Stamp out liberals with the big boot of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: whereasandsoforth
The below from Groliers online @ the following link:

http://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0236650-0&templatename=/article/article.html

definitions of Progressive (as regards politics) come in 3 different flavors/eras: 1912, 1924 & 1948. Of the three, 2 distinctly united with leftist/socialist/communist factions.

Excerpts:

In 1924 the Committee of 48, custodians of the Progressive party label, united with the Socialist party, the railroad unions, and the American Federation of Labor behind the independent candidacy of Robert M. La Follette... ;

and...

In 1947-48 the cold-war policies of President Harry S. Truman caused a major break within the left wing of the Democratic party. The defectors, who favored more cooperative relations with the USSR, organized as the Progressive party and nominated Henry A. Wallace for president in 1948. The party advocated such programs as repeal of the Taft-Hartley Act and the reestablishment of price controls and won the endorsement of the U.S. Communist party. Wallace insisted that prosperity required peace and the tacit recognition of respective spheres of influence.

As the old Marvel Comics bon mot goes; " 'nuff said ".

17 posted on 04/04/2005 3:02:34 PM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: whereasandsoforth

sure would make it interesting

the first thing to go is the celibacy only rule for priests, those priests who wish to marry, may, and the rift between the Roman and Orthodox traditions could be finally healed

I did hear this was one of the Pope's greatest disappointments that he was unable to heal the rift

once you allow married priests, the recruitment problem should be solved, the pedophilia problem may be reduced or at least the coverup forgiven and the word of the Church may flourish, a husband and wife team can be more effective in any event



38 posted on 04/04/2005 4:20:30 PM PDT by llama hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson