Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tessalu

I don't disagree with Cheney, but for a different reason. Perhaps it's sophistry, but to discipline Greer for his decisions in the specific case, barring "clear and compelling" evidence of corruption.

However, Greer's obstinant definace over the congressional subpoenas is actionable, as is the defiance of Whittemore and the appelate system to enforce the clear intent of the law passed by congress and signed by President Bush.

Is that clear as mud?


38 posted on 04/04/2005 9:01:32 AM PDT by MortMan (CON is the opposite of PRO. Is Congress therefore the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

Ok everyone, stop what your doing and call Tom Delay's office and tell him we support a full investigation and Justice for Terri Schindler!

Tom Delay Congressional Phone 1-202-225-5951
Tom Delay Congressional Fax 1-202-225-5241
Tom Delay Majority Leader Phone 1-202-225-4000
Tom Delay Majority Leader Fax 1-202-225-5117


39 posted on 04/04/2005 9:08:30 AM PDT by Halls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: MortMan
as is the defiance of Whittemore and the appelate system to enforce the clear intent of the law passed by congress and signed by President Bush.

Whittemore addressed intent in his rulings. But if you mean the intent was to force a judge to deliver a specific decision, I'd say that intent is blatantly unconstitutional. That's why the text of the law didn't force Whittemore's decision.

49 posted on 04/04/2005 9:28:49 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson