Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueminnesota
A pharmacist shouldn't be allowed to refuse to fill orders any more than a soldier should be allowed to refuse to go to war.

What about a pharmacist who owns the pharmacy?

9 posted on 04/04/2005 8:11:01 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer

Exactly, if they own the business, they should be able to do whatever they want. In the end, they are the ones who face the consequence of their actions. A pharmacist who refuses and gets fired, can find another job. A business owner stands to lose their business, and their investment in that business.


12 posted on 04/04/2005 8:13:15 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
What about a pharmacist who owns the pharmacy?

At that point I think it's pure business. He can decide not to stock any drug he doesn't agree with. He'll lose business accordingly, but that's his problem.

14 posted on 04/04/2005 8:14:49 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson