How convenient. Categorize people as "them" or "us." Makes it so much easier to insult, dehumanize and ignore "them." You don't have to apply reason and decency when interacting with "them."
And as such, I reject your representation of Catholics, who (as I mentioned before) are strongly pro-Life, anti-euthanasia, and, in a word, anti-murder.
What does any of that have to do with the single statement from Tucker with which I agreed? It had to do with separation of powers and the rule of law.
As for your "anti-murder" remark, that's a hoot. So you and folks who think like you are "anti-murder," while all those others out there with any difference of opinion on the many issues raised by Schiavo are "pro-murder?" You make Tucker's case, because if that's not extreme I sure don't know what is.
I just couldn't help keep this one from sliding by, given your last post to me where you characterized me as a "religious extremist" despite the fact I've said nothing to you about religion.
It's not my problem that you can't accept I think the late pope represents Catholics far better than folks like you.
Being considered an "extremist" by you and Cynthia Tucker is both a relief and an honor.
How convenient. Categorize people as "them" or "us." Makes it so much easier to insult, dehumanize and ignore "them."
"Five yards and a night in the box." |