Replies

Once again, I will respond with the question you refuse to answer. It's very simple (which is why you won't do it). It also proves why Judge Greer was the person expanding government authority. So, what is your answer:

Does the government (state or federal) have the authority, determined by conditions set by the legislature or the court, to order food and water to be withheld from a person, even orally (because that is EXACTLY what Greer ordered. He didn't say maybe, if you decide, if she indicates, etc.; he said SHALL NOT be provided, in any form)? If the government has this authority, then what prevents them from setting, through legislation or court action, the conditions under which you can withhold food or water from someone who is not PVS? And how are affirmative answers to the preceding two questions not a massive increase in government control over human life?