You didn't answer the question.
You did post a lot of good information. I am not trying to make anyone paranoid, I just want to know why no others have been mentioned.
Are you new to English? No others have been mentioned because no others contain a judicial order that a living person be denied all sustinence in any form. This case is unique in that characteristic, so there
are no others to be mentioned.
You are trolling, aren't you?