Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RGSpincich
Try some new wording, using the phrase "following Terri's wishes" instead of "murdering". Then rework your logic.

There is no need to "rework" any logic.

One, Michael Schiavo's vague references to supposed past conversations are not hard evidence.

Two, if you handed me a gun and said "I don't want to live anymore, please kill me" and I foolishly followed your wishes, I would be rightly arrested for murder.

And if I said "But he told me to. It's what he wanted" the arresting officers would laugh their tails off.

No evidence was presented that implied murder.

A woman was methodically starved to death. It happened. It was murder. No need to imply anything.

Much evidence was considered regarding Terri's wishes, however.

Other than vague yet convenient recollections , no evidence of any kind was adduced. Certainly nothing in writing.

Mrs. Schindler was caught flat out lying to the court regarding statements Terri made.

Hardly. She simply dared to contradict Michael Schiavo's account of events.

No wonder the judge believed Schiavo.

There is no wonder - because Mrs. Schindler made the fatal mistake of hiring attorneys who were not lifetime members of the "Re-elect Judge Greer" society.

192 posted on 04/03/2005 7:55:27 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
Hardly. She simply dared to contradict Michael Schiavo's account of events.

Not quite see Post #195.

199 posted on 04/03/2005 7:59:25 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson