Legally, he was her husband, and had all rights as such. No matter what you think. It's what the law thinks that matters.
Adultry? That means nothing this day and age, thanks to the erossion of morality in this country. Those are the facts.
The man has needs too. Women use that as an excuse all the time as well.
I'm an anti-feminist traditional woman of the most vocal nature and even I find your remarks repugnant. Nobody wanted to stop Mikey from screwing his way around Florida to "meet his manly needs." He did plenty of that before he shacked up with Ms. Centonze in or around 1995. No one has really even objected to his serial adultry.
People object to his refusal to divorce his wife and/or give up legal control over her ESPECIALLY after he planted his manly seed in Ms. Centonze not once but twice. But Mikey wanted his cake and to eat it , too and you defend this pig and then talk to the rest of us about "morality." Sheesh.
A crucial component of recognizing the sanctity of contracts is the recognition that a breach of a contract by one party frees the other party of obligations.
When Michael violated and openly renounced his marriage contract with Terri, that should have ended any obligations she had to him and any authority he had over her. To say otherwise is to impugn the integrity of marriage as a contract.