Yeah, but he NEVER provided evidence that anyone is DOING that. He's actually as a pawn of the elite, saying what they think, but don't have the credibility to say. So, they shove the reliable Danforth out there, hey, he's an Episcopal Priest you know, to say what the cultural (self-annoited) elites want to put out.
It would be the same, if Danforth said the GOP shouldn't make laws legalizing cannibalism. For itself, it's a good point, but who's advocating legalizing cannabalism. LiberationIT, I don't know how old you are, but don't be taken in by this shell game.
Right, no evidence, but it appears to be more an opinion.
It does bring up an important point; that is that non religious people, or, perhaps people in non mainstream religions; are very concerned that people in power will use their faith to impose their will on others. The religious right, I believe, need to be mindful of a potential backlash in this respect.
My point is that if faith is used to make law, it will lead to disagreements as we have no way to agree on whose faith should be preeminent.
This not a right or left thing, or a faith issue. We have here many people on the right who are people of faith and conservative. There are people on the left who are people of faith and liberal. I see no basis for those two sides to come to agreement. So, if either side uses their faith alone to make law, there will be disagreements.