Seems to me that what is needed for this autopsy is a sober, serious, professional examination of the evidence.
This case is already a ghastly circus. At some point the circus becomes more important to all the parties than the reality.
A woman is dead. The pathologist, who is well credentialed, can do the autopsy. Others can look at the evidence at any point. Cyril Wecht whatever his expertise, is there for media exposure for his giant ego. I don't know that that contributes to a sober accounting of what the evidence in this autopsy shows.
And Thogmartin runs his shop. You and have have no idea who was there at the post. Isuggest we wait and see. And the autopsy table is no place for opposing parties to play out their roles as partisans.
We differ in our opinions, that is obvious. I suggest we leave it at that.
I hear you, I just want justice. Whatever that takes is fine with moi.
Yet the more unfounded opinions are, we often find that the more vehemently those unfounded opinions are asserted.
As Bart Simpson said, "Sorry, mom, the mob has spoken".