[NobleCynic]

I don't understand. In the past, people were willing to use violence to try and stop LEGAL immigration. So are you saying that if its ILLEGAL immigration people won't use violence? Or are you saying that violence would be justified?

There is a difference between legal and illegal immigration. No one questions this. You purposefully misinterpret my arguments. If you approve of violence, just say so. I would respect that. Dancing around it however... I can't.

[Happy2BMe]

"There is a difference between legal and illegal immigration. No one questions this. You purposefully misinterpret my arguments. If you approve of violence, just say so. I would respect that. Dancing around it however... I can't."

=====================

"Violence?"

~ ~ ~

America's Most Dangerous Gang - MS13 - Violent, Vicious, and Spreading Fast.

~ ~ ~

"We have Nicaragua, soon we will have El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Mexico. One day, tomorrow or five years or fifteen years from now, we're going to take 5 to 10 million Mexicans and they are going into Dallas, into El Paso, into Houston, into New Mexico, into San Diego, and each one will have embedded in his mind the idea of killing ten Americans." --Thomas Borge, Nicaragua Interior Minister as quoted in the Washington Times, March 27, 1985

[international american]

"I don't understand. "

Oh yes you do

""You purposefully misinterpret my arguments""

No, I purposely caught you trying to make illegal immigration and legal immigration indifferentiable. That is the old trick of the hard left.

"If you approve of violence, just say so. I would respect that. Dancing around it however... I can't."

Uh uh. You are conserned with violence now? Where did I mention that word? If the minutemen are fired upon, they should shoot back. My guess is that no shots will be fired on either side.