Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ValenB4
At least you are consistent. Most times I find people supported the SA sanctions but not the Iraqi sanctions.

Problem with the Iraqi sanctions was the Saddam. However, he never received the blame he deserved.
27 posted on 04/02/2005 6:48:56 PM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Gunrunner2
I don't like Saddam Hussein and am not going to defend his misdeeds. But he has been disproportionately villified over the years. That first Iraq war should have been avoided. Iraq did have some legitimate complaints against Kuwait, most glaringly its slant drilling under the border, and Saddam thought we had given him a green light to invade. For that part of the world, he was a progressive and would have been content to continue to do business with the US. Gas prices would certainly be lower.

But I don't believe in collective punishment. To employ sanctions hurts an entire population and does breed hatred against us. In the final analysis, the sanctions didn't do any good since ended up fighting another war to get rid of Saddam.

I oppose sanctions in principle. Economic growth is the most effective form of social change because it is peaceful and empowers all members of society, giving them financial power and access to knowledge.

30 posted on 04/02/2005 7:01:52 PM PST by ValenB4 (Pope John Paul II, I love you and will miss you! God bless you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson