Cute but your statement underscores your predisposition in this matter. There is ample dispute in the facts of this case and the 'Impartiality' of Greer is another area of reasonable dispute. The bottom line is that a single judge, in a relative legal vacuum, made a finding of fact, completely controlled the legal process and was subject to review only insofar as he did so in accordance with the rules of procedure.
At no time, and contrary to the assertions that 30+ judges sided with his findings, were these findings tested in any subsequent appeals.
I personally would have welcomed a de novo review of the 'Facts' of this matter, conducted in an indisputably neutral and geographically distant venue, and would have stood by the results therefrom.
IMO At worst, this process is indicative of serious corruption of the process and, at best, a completely mishandled exercise in judicial rigidity and arrogance.
That is how I and many others feel about this sad case, no matter how much it embarrasses you.
In a legal atmosphere precisely defined by the Florida legislature.
Now, maybe you disagree with the Florida legislature. Fine. But Judge Greer followed the law as written, as evidenced by the concurrence of the 30+ judges.
"I personally would have welcomed a de novo review"
No doubt. You and millions of others would have loved to delay the outcome for as long as possible. One more exam by one more doctor. One more test. How about an MRI? PET? A USSC ruling. Congressional legislation.
One more trial. One more delay.
15 years, drt1. Time enough in those 15 years.
At worst, this process is indicative of serious corruption of the process and, at best, a completely mishandled exercise in judicial rigidity and arrogance."
I disagree. I believe Judge Greer upheld Florida law. Your frustration is misdirected.