Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheSpottedOwl
"No one's feeding tube should be removed, nor any other source of hydration and nourishment, until the person dies."

Even if it's in writing?

Well, I disagree.

163 posted on 04/02/2005 3:53:39 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen



That's where living wills are dangerous. No one foresaw the day when nutrition and liquids would become "life support". I always thought that a living will would be a good idea. If I were terminal, I wouldn't want them to resuscitate me. If something should happen, and I lingered breathing on my own, let me be. Feed me, water me, and medicate me, but don't kill me by starving me to death. Oh and for God's sake, give me a decent blanket. The ones at the hospital wouldn't keep a hamster warm.

Not only do average Americans now need to speak lawyerese, but they need to learn how to decipher Clintonese.

So be careful when you say "in writing", because a feeding tube is now in the same category as true life support. Once again, I'm talking about machines that do the work for the organs that failed.


168 posted on 04/02/2005 4:03:04 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl (Free Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson