[DameAutour]

Woah, you just made a giant, uncharitable leap.

I don't see any allegations of conspiracy in that post. Are you here to have a discussion or collect "evidence" to substantiate what you already believe?

I took drt1's post to simply mean that the approach taken by the medical examiner (the arrogant, "I'll have no one dictate to ME what I ought to do, I know everything", closed rather than open ie ham fisted) is typical of a lot of what has happened in this case, and that's unfortunate.

The process hasn't been open and honest at any point. And that's foolish on the part of all involved. Not necessarily conspiratorial. Just blindingly arrogant.

You are being uncharitable, because drt1 made it clear he has no preference for a particular conclusion, just wanted a fair, open and consistent process.

[Nathan Zachary]

"The ME is well within his legal powers to limit observers and conduct the procedure in essentially any manner he sees fit in the circumstances. Unfortunately, by limiting access to and, possibly, the scope of the autopsy he is fanning the flames further"

That is highly suggestive of a conspiracy. Why wouldn't he do his job properly? Who is influencing him? CONSPIRACY!