To: Huck
I was under the impression that this USSC case was about being able to sue the MANUFACTURER of a technology rather than the USER of a technology. Sorta like you wanting to sue Ford for $100's of millions claiming whiplash injuries, if I bumped your Lada's bumper with my trailer hitch while backing my F350 dually into a parking space at the local grocery.
70 posted on
04/02/2005 7:08:29 AM PST by
pyx
(Rule #1. The LEFT lies. Rule #2. See Rule #1.)
To: pyx
You're right about this case. It's about whether Grokster induces theft. I happen to think they do.
74 posted on
04/02/2005 7:12:40 AM PST by
Huck
(mp3 file sharing is THEFT.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson