[Dave S]

Can you show me where this disabled woman who was not terminally ill or brain dead but rather disabled similar to a mentally retarded person had ever stated in writing she wanted this inhumane treatment?

Then rewrite the law to say that someones desires have to be in writing or to setup criteria for guardianship or to say that people in PVS have to be reviewed by a panel of truly reknown Neurologists and that atleast four of five must agree to pull feeding tube or plug or whatever. Your task is with the legistlature not the courts. The courts deal with what is given them.

[Reaganwuzthebest]

Then rewrite the law to say that someones desires have to be in writing or to setup criteria for guardianship or to say that people in PVS have to be reviewed by a panel of truly reknown

There's dispute, which Greer obviously ignored that she was in a PVS so that by itself imo should have disqualified the Grim Reaper's "decision".

Making it even more suspect was the way Mikey changed his version of what Terri wanted on several on several occasions. And then there's also those unexplained broken bones and how she came to be incapacitated in the first place. Again evidence Greer pretended didn't exist.

Running around on threads insulting those who feel there was an injustice and insinuating people are "religious fanatics" for doing so makes me feel even more strongly that people like you are never in a position to make such calls for my loved ones.

[ninenot]

Perhaps the courts really do deal with what's given to them. But pulling life-sustenance is wrong, "courts" or no courts.

Those laws which contradict natural moral laws are void, and that's the substance of the Congressional action.

Not that GrimGreer cared; he was bound and determined to be the poster boy for the Krytocracy, and he's gotten there.

Now it's a matter of what the reaction from the public will be, and I don't think Grim's going to like it--nor the moron Fed in Tampa, nor the 11th Circus clowns.

But it will be well-earned.