[beyond the sea]

Sad as it is to say, this site is considered very, very dangerous by the scum of the left and the Democrat party and they will do anything to disrupt it or attempt to damage its credibility. And I'm not just talking about the illiterate morons who drift over from DUh - - they're easy to pick out - - I mean real live, real clever Democrat operatives.

You're right. Being a student of dirty tricks since before the Donald Segretti days, I have often noticed, on variant political threads over the years, the very sly machinations of those who come here who either want to apologize for Democrat's actions, or in a different way, attempt to bring outright disrepute to some Republicans and conservatives' actions. It sometimes seems to be done with great dexterity however.

As you say, "constant vigilance is a must."

On the humorous side, I'm still real proud of Karl Rove getting Osama to make that tape a few days before the election. And this trap of Karl's: "A photograph posted on an Islamist Web site appears to be that of an action figure (Cody) and not a U.S. soldier being held hostage" was Karl's greatest. Really made those terrorists look desperate. ;-)

Btw, here's wondering if there can be a new term (between 'newbie' and 'oldtimer') for someone who has spent around six and a half years, about three hours a day seven days a week reading threads on FR, but has not posted all those years? 'Lurker' isn't positive enough, how about an AQA, 'a quiet admirer'?

;-)

[Alamo-Girl]

Btw, here's wondering if there can be a new term (between 'newbie' and 'oldtimer') for someone who has spent around six and a half years, about three hours a day seven days a week reading threads on FR, but has not posted all those years? 'Lurker' isn't positive enough, how about an AQA, 'a quiet admirer'?

I think that's a great idea! Another possibility might be LTL (long time Lurker). Either way, it could be part of one's handle or tagline!

Thank you for your post!