No. You're arguing with me over things I never said.
I said that under the law the spouse is responsible for medical decisions like this when a person is unable to make such decisions themselves.
The fact is no less than SIX courts have been involved in this case and NONE have contested the application of the law making Michael Schaivo responsible for the decision.
11 February 2000: Judge Greer rules feeding tube can be removed, but this is not carried out immediately
23 April 2001: US Supreme Court refuses to intervene
13 December 2002: Judge Greer stays order to remove feeding tube to allow appeal
6 June 2003: Appeal court upholds Judge Greer's ruling
6 May 2004: County Court rules that Terri's Law is unconstitutional and a violation of the right to privacy
23 September 2004: Florida's Supreme Court strikes down Terri's Law
25 January 2005: US Supreme Court rejects Jeb Bush's appeal to change ruling
25 February 2005: County Court judge issues a three week stay
16 March 2005: Florida Appeals Court refuses to block removal of Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube and sets 18 March 2005 as the day the tube will be removed
22 March 2005: A Florida judge refuses to order doctors to resume feeding, on the grounds that the family is unlikely to win a new court case.
23 March 2005: A panel of appeal judges backs the Florida decision.
24 March 2005: The US Supreme Court refuses to hear an emergency appeal by Mrs Schiavo's parents, and later a Florida judge rejects a petition by Governor Jeb Bush to become her legal guardian.
25 Mar 2005:: A federal judge rejects parents' second appeal. And an appeals court rejects bid to overturn federal judge ruling.
26 Mar 2005:: A Florida state judge rejects the parents' latest appeal. The Schindlers' lawyer described it as their last chance to save Mrs Schiavo, after they decided to end federal appeals.
27 Mar 2005: The Florida Supreme Court rejects an emergency appeal by Mrs Schiavo's parents.
30 March 2005: A US federal appeals court rejects a petition by the parents to have the feeding tube reinserted. Hours later, the US Supreme Court refuses for the sixth time to intervene.
That list of rubber stampism is precisely why the U.S. Congress authorized and expected a de novo trial of the case in Whittemore's court. He too turned out to be a member of rubber stamptroopers, ignoring the glaring failure to afford Terri due process ... and just incase you don't understand that phrase, conflicts of interest by Greer and the guardian amount to failed due process if left unaddressed by other courts.