[robertpaulsen]

"There was NO 'clear and convincing" evidence of an oral directive"

The judge heard the evidence and concluded there was.

How can you say that? Or is that merely your opinion?

[FairOpinion]

I just gave you the FACTS.

The judge was wrong or deliberately ignored the evidence. BTW, Felos gave him some generous political contributions, while the case was in his court.

[FairOpinion]

You insist on presenting non-facts as facts, and ignoring real facts.

There is a great thread for you and those of you with similar notions, and refusal to even consider all the facts:

MANIFESTO OF THE WPPFF/WILD TURKEYS/COALITION OF THE SANE

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1373116/posts

Go high-five each other on the successful murder of an innocent, defenseless woman.

[supercat]

"There was NO 'clear and convincing" evidence of an oral directive"

The judge heard the evidence and concluded there was.

If a judge were to find that two plus two is five, would that make it so?