Why should a judge usurp a medical decision? And if medicine is about sustaining life, well, I don't really understand the relevance of the tests. As I posed, it strikes me that the decision is illegal on its face. I wonder what statute Greer relied upon for that one.
Florida code, art. 666:
I would assume he probably relies upon 666, quoted above, for his authority. Would seem the most logical source.
- All rulings by George Greer are correct. Any law which would conflict with a ruling by George Greer is void.
- In the event a ruling by Greer is found to be in error, the case should be evaluated in accordance with 666.1.
- This section shall become law whether or not it is signed by the governor or even introduced to the legislature.
- It is not necessary to reproduce this section in so-called 'official' copies of the Florida code. Its non-appearance therein shall not be construed as evidence of its non-veracity.