Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

I listened to none other than Ken Starr discuss this case, and like Mr. Starr, I believe that it was adjudicated properly, and that the decision, though unfortunate, was lawful.

I also agree with Starr on the fact that the Federal government had no business getting involved in this.

I don't believe that you would have supported Terri's right to die EVEN with overwhelming documentation to support her wishes.

You can't be both pro-life, and supportive of a person's desire to end life willfully.


459 posted on 04/01/2005 11:14:30 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez

Luis, since when have you become the definer of what is allowed or disallowed for someone to be pro-life? [I recall our debate regarding the death penalty and my anti-abortion beliefs.] And I thought you were a Catholic ... and you know what The Holy Father says about food and water for disabled people. I am kind of surprised to hear you so worshipful of Ken Starr though ... and I happened to have listened to him when he said he had not dug into this case and used qualifiers like 'it appears' and 'it is likely that' when asked to pronounce validity upon the court process in Florida.


484 posted on 04/01/2005 11:29:35 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Ah, so you also don't believe abortion is murder.


492 posted on 04/01/2005 11:32:56 PM PST by SendShaqtoIraq (Reggie, we will always love you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson