Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez

Krauthammer argued that where there was a disagreement between the spouse and the parents, and no living will, the party who was willing to care for the person in PVS state should prevail. I agree with Krauthammer. He has it exactly right in the sense that I agree with him. Within certain constrainst as outlined, choose life, choose the nurturing party, where there is a lack of certainty of the preferences of the PSV person, chosen with thought and gravitas, by virtue of having to pen and sign a written document.


427 posted on 04/01/2005 11:03:57 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
"Krauthammer argued that where there was a disagreement between the spouse and the parents, and no living will, the party who was willing to care for the person in PVS state should prevail."

Agreed.

However, in Terri's case, Florida Law, not a Charles Krauthammer Op Ed took precedent.

432 posted on 04/01/2005 11:05:30 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson