Here you go.
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0300.pdf
Shows tests were done every year up to 1997.
So, in what way would it have been "medical evaluation" or "experimental" for Terri to have ice chips and sips of water? Was the risk of aspiration a reason to deny her these comforts in her last 2 weeks?
Terri passed the test of time. Regardless of any test, she continued to swallow her saliva - thin water, more difficult than thickened liquids to swallow without aspiration.
Why deny her mother the ability to give her a spoonful water in her last 2 weeks? Why the legal fiction that offering oral hydration was "experimental"?