[Jorge]

But even at the maximum that does not give you the right to project that deprivation onto a person who did not ask to be treated so extremely.

The courts determined that this was Terri's wish per her husband's testimony...several times over many years.

I don't know if they were right or wrong and neither do you.

[HiTech RedNeck]

No, they did not. The oral feeding, as dangerous or inefficient as it might be, was forbidden on the sophist grounds that it was "unwarranted experimental treatment." I.e. it got legally pigeonholed as something that it clearly wasn't.