That was enough for the Court.
Of course, you want to dismiss their testimony based on how you "feel" about them.
Because something is "good enough for the Court" it's automatically good enough for the people for whom the government is supposed to be of, by, and for?
And, here's the $64,000 question: is it good enough for God?
That is your assumption and it is wrong.
MY feelings have nothing, aboslutely nothing, to do with this. Michael Schiavo's own very flawed and contradictory testimonies and actions are clearly indicative of a man who was unfit to make any decision regarding this woman's care, much less her life.
I found this of interest.
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/03/26/news_pf/Tampabay/She_s_the_other_woman.shtml
She was constantly seeing doctors and going to therapy. She had to wear a neck brace, had trouble carrying groceries, couldn't walk, sit or bend without pain. She couldn't go out on the boat, didn't feel well enough to spend time with friends.
Talking about Michael's finance'. She had better watch out since she may not have the "quality of life required" and see another side of Michael.