Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Resort to Throwing Food on Pundits (Pat Buchanan)
Newsmax.com ^ | 4/1/2005

Posted on 04/01/2005 9:27:46 AM PST by ArmyBratproud

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
"He could have faced a felony assault charge, but Pat Buchanan decided to not press that charge," university spokesman Matt Kurz said. --------------------------------------------------
1 posted on 04/01/2005 9:27:47 AM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Well if you're going to hurl salad dressing at someone.......


2 posted on 04/01/2005 9:29:10 AM PST by iceemonster ("When is silence ever the answer?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
I have very mixed feelings about this "throwing pies and such" at TV pundits.

I think we should hear from both sides on this important issue before passing any new laws either prohibiting or requiring it. ;-)

3 posted on 04/01/2005 9:31:25 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
"He could have faced a felony assault charge, but Pat Buchanan decided to not press that charge,"

Why the hell not?

These low IQ libs need to be put in stocks in the public square and let the town's people throw rotten eggs at his head. This crap's got to stop. Diversity of thought only works one way with these low life dingbats.

4 posted on 04/01/2005 9:34:17 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Was is French dressing? If so, felony charges should have been brought.
5 posted on 04/01/2005 9:34:34 AM PST by JRjr (hMMM?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Looks like we need some food-control legislation here.


6 posted on 04/01/2005 9:34:37 AM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Buchanan must be losing his sharpness. He was assaulted by a disruptive demonstrator at a campaign appearance back in 1992, and he ended up laying quite a beating on the guy.


7 posted on 04/01/2005 9:35:16 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRjr

You could put someone's eye out with a poppy seed or a crouton!


8 posted on 04/01/2005 9:36:57 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds

"I think we should hear from both sides on this important issue before passing any new laws either prohibiting or requiring it. ;-)"

Perhaps we should even pass legislation on this issue. It will be called, the TV Pundits Bill. ;)


9 posted on 04/01/2005 9:37:07 AM PST by DollarCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Party of Tolerance and Diversity (c) Ping!


10 posted on 04/01/2005 9:37:41 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Hate crime! Hate crime! Stupid liberals.


11 posted on 04/01/2005 9:37:44 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRjr

LOL.!! Too Funny.
Use a Frog, Go to Jail. Oui,Oui.


12 posted on 04/01/2005 9:38:06 AM PST by Pompah (Oh Yeah Babe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Who is Pat Buchanan?


13 posted on 04/01/2005 9:43:43 AM PST by Wheee The People (I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. John 10:10(KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Two bad decisions on Buchanan's part. He should not have cut it short. In doing so he conceded a round to a liberal, which should never be done. He could have made some short comment about the immaturity of some opponents, and continued on, with the salad dressing serving as a continuous reminder of the fact. Second, he should have pressed charges. Immaturity and foolishness are not actionable offenses. But any time a liberal's actions become illegal, he needs to face charges in court. Most of them never will grasp the idea of responsibility, but punishment may possibly improve the behavior of some of them.


14 posted on 04/01/2005 9:48:05 AM PST by Aarchaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Two bad decisions on Buchanan's part. He should not have cut it short. In doing so he conceded a round to a liberal, which should never be done. He could have made some short comment about the immaturity of some opponents, and continued on, with the salad dressing serving as a continuous reminder of the fact. Second, he should have pressed charges. Immaturity and foolishness are not actionable offenses. But any time a liberal's actions become illegal, he needs to face charges in court. Most of them never will grasp the idea of responsibility, but punishment may possibly improve the behavior of some of them.


15 posted on 04/01/2005 9:49:59 AM PST by Aarchaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
but Pat Buchanan decided to not press that charge

Big mistake. Especially since this was witnessed by a large audience. Stupid stupid stupid.

16 posted on 04/01/2005 9:52:12 AM PST by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aarchaeus

William Kristol must've had more class than Buchanan then.


17 posted on 04/01/2005 9:53:28 AM PST by bicyclerepair (Help I'm surrounded by RATS (South. Florida))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

The liberals have run out of the few arguments they have had justifying their actions. Personal attacks, the ace-in-the-hole they've always relied upon, backfires when tried anymore. Their latest recourse is to toss food. Next, they'll wet their diapers.


18 posted on 04/01/2005 9:55:58 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wheee The People

Instead of asking who Pat is, and since you are sitting at a computer, why don't you do a search and find out all the information you can (and then some). I'm sure his complete bio is available somewhere. That should answer your unnecessary question.

Or was information not the reason for the question?


19 posted on 04/01/2005 9:59:16 AM PST by whereasandsoforth (Stamp out liberals with the big boot of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRjr

Grench??? Was it Kosher?


20 posted on 04/01/2005 10:03:33 AM PST by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson