I stated that I chose to disregard Felos' version in favor of Bobby's...
And you then accused me of ignoring "the FACTS."
In what way could your statement possibly be interpreted other than endorsing Felos' statement as being "the FACTS?"
"I stated that I chose to disregard Felos' version in favor of Bobby's..."
No, you stated, in post #49, that "...the reason he protested leaving was not because Terri was going to die in the next few minutes, but because the last time it was "Michael's turn" to be in the room had lasted for several hours and Bobby did not want to be excluded again for that length of time...
It didn't take much for that to get turned into "Michael made the family leave at the moment of death," however."
Thus, you exonerated Michael by your exclusion of any other explanation.
This being your conclusory statement, you left no such indication that there were opposing views (and the opposing views in this case came from the Schiavo camp itself, no less).
The FACTS are that there are ALREADY numerous versions of what happened in those last few minutes (most being given by Mr. Felos himself). Your version of the Bobby Schindler comments that you have produced in post #49 have been challenged, and you seem to be somewhat alone in your remembrance of the Scarborough show, or whatever.
MS did himself no favor by not inviting the family in during the last moments, no matter whether he ordered them out, or whether he simply took advantage of the "my turn" rule (if there ever was such a rule). This action has spite written all over it.