Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re

According to the Senators and members of Congress who have discussed the matter, it never crossed their mind that the judge would not grant the TRO, given the plain language of the statute which provided for de novo review.

The judge did NOT follow the statute.

I've been a lawyer for almost 20 years, and I had become inured to the callousness of judges, but this case has really pissed me off.

Anything to get out to the golf course and a cocktail.


38 posted on 04/01/2005 12:25:02 PM PST by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defence of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: CobaltBlue

Then they're fools. How long have those standards been in place? Seventy years now? More? And most of them went to law school, Bill Frist excepted. Sorry, but if it truly never occurred to them the the judge would apply the same standards to Terri Schiavo as he would to anyone else seeking relief, then they're shortsighted fools who shouldn't be put in charge of organizing anything more complex than a medium-sized office picnic, nevermind the government of the United States.


40 posted on 04/01/2005 12:37:45 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson