To: Republican Red
I'm not agreeing with Chris Matthews, but this whole episode is not nearly as simple as either side wants to make it.
To: Joe Bonforte
I agree. But it always is more complicated. But the sight of that mother with her daughter smiling at her just gets burned in one's brain. This did not have to end this way, it really didn't.
42 posted on
04/01/2005 7:15:44 AM PST by
cajungirl
(no)
To: Joe Bonforte
I'm not agreeing with Chris Matthews, but this whole episode is not nearly as simple as either side wants to make it.What are you tying to say? That Mr. Schindler had his own agenda? Even if we assume that both sides wanted Terri's settlement money, (a heinous lie), all we had to do was let the Schindler family have one year to care for Terri. Give them the money to care for her, let them get tests, treatment, etc, before pulling the plug.
To: Joe Bonforte
It IS simple! When there are questions, one errs on the side of LIFE! FULL STOP!!
57 posted on
04/01/2005 7:33:44 AM PST by
PaRebel
(Visualize Whirled Peas!)
To: Joe Bonforte
If Michael had just divorced and thereby given guardianship to the Schindlers when he went on with his new life, nobody would have even known his name. I will always believe that he stayed in at first for the money and then after that it became hatred and spite toward the parents. In the end, it was all about hurting them...not loving Terri.
67 posted on
04/01/2005 7:58:19 AM PST by
GOP_Proud
(Those who proclaim tolerance have the least for my views.)
To: Joe Bonforte
Well said. It is much more complex than the made for TV drama it turned into.
79 posted on
04/01/2005 8:35:28 AM PST by
MJM59
To: Joe Bonforte
I'm not agreeing with Chris Matthews, but this whole episode is not nearly as simple as either side wants to make it.
But it is simple and that is what makes it all the more crazy.
98 posted on
04/02/2005 8:42:50 PM PST by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson