Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void; Cincinatus' Wife
It would take many fewer much safer launches.

The individual launches might not be any safer, but since they would be unmanned no one would get hurt if there were a malfunction. Even if the risks were the same per launch, with fewer launches there is a lower probability of encountering a catastrophic failure lifting modules for the ISS.

67 posted on 04/01/2005 7:57:55 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

Less equipment, fewer systems, (e.g. no need ofr life support) = less to go wrong, fewer failures.


72 posted on 04/01/2005 8:06:32 AM PST by null and void (innocent, incapacitated, inconvenient, and insured - a lethal combination for Terri...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson