Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: huac
Lewis isn't a bad guy, he just wants pot to be legal. Considering where he's gotten in his life while smoking metric tons of it, he probably has a point.

Soros, on the other hand, is a hemmorhoid.

-Eric

19 posted on 04/01/2005 12:25:02 AM PST by E Rocc (All Hail The Holy PSP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E Rocc
Lewis isn't a bad guy, he just wants pot to be legal. Considering where he's gotten in his life while smoking metric tons of it, he probably has a point.

He wants to legalize pot.
He has made a lot of money.
Therefore he has a point?

The point is on the top of his head.

The next time he gets caught with pot they should throw his ass in jail
where he belongs, and keep him there.

36 posted on 04/01/2005 1:20:59 AM PST by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
Lewis inherited the base of his money. The Lewis fortune came from lumberyards and dry cleaning in Cincinnati, IIRC. His mother's trust is known as the Jewish Foundation of Greater Cleveland. All the heirs sit on the board. There are several brothers in Peter B's generation....3? I don't know for sure. The older generation controls the majority of the money, while their children's generation has several million each, but, of course, will eventually inherit the rest.

I knew one of his nieces-in-law. Fervent secularist and Green, anti-military and otherwise bored with the life her and her husband's money affords them.

They all hate all religions, including, interestingly enough, esoteric, new age cults. They do consider themselves superior, intellectually, and the ones I knew are part of the secularist left that tried to appropriate the term *brights*. They give away the money (but keep enough to own several homes each and all the trimmings, including $3k custom-designed toilets) because they are guilty over not earning it themselves. They are convinced no one can become as rich as they are without inside knowledge and connections and want to *provide* for the rest of us so we won't want to take away theirs. They do have a grudging respect for those who have earned their own way, especially if they are artists.

They hate Bush with passion, which is why I use the past tense in describing our relationship.

The trustfunders don't pay taxes at the rates we do, as their money isn't earned income.

The art is part of the superiority. Several of the 40-something generation are professional artists, not that bad (or good), but able to survive because they are rich and have connections. This grates on them.

Personally, I don't think any of Warhol's work is *art*. It is clever commercial illustration, IMO. Silkscreening publicly available portraits and product illustration in a variety of colorways is kitsch, not art. Warhol himself knew he was clever, but not really talented, and made fun of art critic pretensions.

The self-hatreds of the super wealthy aren't something you can figure out rationally. For example, Green Peter owns a converted tugboat that is his personal yacht. It burns 100s of gallons of diesel/hour and even shocks some of the rest of the family.
47 posted on 04/01/2005 5:15:56 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson