[logic]

I don't see it that way, probably because I don't know what the law says. But what the law shoud say is that the judge will assure that what is done, is done in the best interests of the subject (teri). once the circumstances of michael's common law wife were ascertained, the judge should have immediately withdrawn custody from michael and given it the parents due to the obvious probability of a conflict of interest. There is no such evidence of any probability of conflict of interest for the parents being guardians. If the law is contrary to that then the law needs to be changed.

[Servant of the 9]

If the law is contrary to that then the law needs to be changed.

I think that's what I said.
If you don't like the results, change the state laws.

So9