Posted on 03/31/2005 4:30:05 PM PST by neverdem
Lame excuse and explanation as usual. And pleading guilty is just scratching the surface. What was his real motive? Who directed him? What did they not want the commission to see? Of course, the MSM is not interested to know or has decided that the American people do not need to know.
Not much has changed in procedures since your day. You gave a precise account of what should happen and most often does happen, in the world of security. Sandy Berger and the National Archives gave us an example of what shouldn't and usually doesn't happen.
muawiyah fyi, incase you haven't seen this thread.
I'll wait for the announcement tomorrow.
Hillary is awful. She has come out against the President's plan for social security AND immigration. She is openly defiant of President Bush's agenda.
She may agree with him on Iraq, but that is not enough for me.
All true Freepers are expected to do everything in their power to defeat Hillary & promote the President's agenda.
Presidential Statement on GOP Budget Position
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release October 19, 1995
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
The Briefing Room
11:09 A.M. EDT
**SNIP**
Q Mr. President, may we take it -- just a final follow-up on this -- may we take it from what you said here today that what you meant to say on taxes was that while you raised them more than you would have liked to, that it was perhaps a mistake to say you raised them too much?
Clinton: If I said anything which implies that I think that we didn't do what we should have done, given the choices we faced at the time, I shouldn't have said that. My mother once said I should never give a talk after 7:00 p.m. at night, especially if I'm tired, and she sure turned out to be right is all I can say. (Laughter.)
I've been wondering what's been going on with SandraStuffedSocks...........
.
I'll NEVER FORGET...
BILL CLINTON's "It ain't no big thing" laughing media diverting reaction to SANDY BERGER's being caught with his pants-socks-shoes-coat pockets jammed full of Top Secret 911 documents outside our National Archives.
This just before BILL CLINTON and SANDY BERGER's appearance before the 911 Commission that was investigating them.
The Enemy is now Within and...
always has been.
.
Sandy is missing out on doing lenthy hard time, and the implication is that he's deprived of his security clearance for only 3 years (which I think has to be the remainder of the period for which he was authorized anyway).
Sandy gave somebody up to the feds. Who could it be?
I'd like to see the answers to those as well. Seems Mr. Berger is very willing to go down on his sword.
How about 1 year and 100K per document?
I would be inclined to think that he had powerful friends that were gonna go on a destroy mission even more than has already happened!
Because of this Sandy's clients will have a difficult time getting security clearances, and Lord help anybody who worked for him ~ their careers are ruined!
The Berger story slips by under the MSM radar, while Tom Delay is publicly hounded for unproven allegations by a known Democrat prosecutor.
MSM fairplay is nonexistent.
Can anyone explain to me why a FORMER National Security Adviser still has access to classified documents?
Anyone.....Anyone......Bueller?
So how will he be punished? A big sloppy wet kiss and a few million for helping the Clintons stay out of jail.
BTTT
copies? If it's another version, it's not a copy,
"Republican Leaders are the ones letting him off"
GOP leaders have never quite "gotten it" about this reciprocity thing ;)
Hillery! is awful true, but why is Berger going to be
allowed to be recertified for a Security clearence in
three years???
2008???
If it was up to me, he'd "never work in this town again".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.