Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: peyton randolph
Failure to provide a de novo review despite a statutory mandate to do so.

Whitmore held a hearing. Gibbs did not present any "de novo" facts for consideration; all he did was regurgitate complaints about the way Greer handled the state case.

You get what you pay for with a pro bono barrister.

26 posted on 03/31/2005 3:18:32 PM PST by sinkspur (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

Gree asserted that family members who heard her say that she wanted to live were in error based on a falsely assumed date by the judge and later admitted to be in error. That fact was not reviewed.


60 posted on 03/31/2005 3:33:51 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

Why don't you apply to be on the team preparing the defense for the impeachment.


131 posted on 03/31/2005 4:23:59 PM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

True. The Schindler sucky lawyers didn't help matters much.


253 posted on 03/31/2005 6:05:50 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
According to Congressman Steve King

However, the judge ruled against her case with only a few hours of consideration and without hearing the necessary evidence.

287 posted on 03/31/2005 7:37:15 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson